Hedge Fund Analyst Secures £1.1m Mortgage on £1.4m Home Using Multi-Year Bonus History
A senior analyst at a London hedge fund needed £1.1m for a £1.4m house in the year his bonus fell to less than half its previous level. On the reading many lenders may apply, the loan was out of reach; a lender applying 60% of a two-year average agreed it, and the purchase completed with the deposit unchanged at £300,000.
Client Snapshot
£1,400,000
Purchase price
£1,100,000
Mortgage amount
Just under 79%
Loan to Value (LTV)
Senior analyst at a London long/short equity hedge fund, eight years in the industry, four on the current desk · Three-bedroom terraced house, South West London · £300,000 deposit · Capital and interest, five-year fixed rate
Key constraint
The latest bonus, the figure many lenders may default to, was the lowest in four years, following a flat year for the fund
Context
Eight years into a hedge fund career, four of them on the same long/short equity desk, the client was buying a three-bedroom house in South West London at £1.4m. The £300,000 deposit had been built up from savings and previous bonus rounds. The house was found and the seller wanted to move, so waiting for the next bonus round was not an option, and after a flat year for the fund there was no guarantee the next award would be higher anyway.
The problem was the most recent number. His latest bonus was £120,000, less than half the £270,000 of the year before, and most lenders may start from the latest figure.
How lenders average and discount performance-linked pay is covered in our guide to hedge fund mortgage affordability →
The Challenge
The income was strong in every year, but it was structured the way hedge fund pay is structured: a £150,000 base salary and a discretionary annual bonus that tracked fund performance, worth between £120,000 and £270,000 over the last four years. Two features of standard bonus treatment counted against the case.
First, the percentage. Many lenders may apply 50% to a discretionary annual bonus. Second, the averaging method. A common approach is to take the lower of the latest year and a two-year average, and after a down year the lower figure is by definition the latest one. On that reading, recognised income becomes £150,000 plus 50% of £120,000, or £210,000 in total. At 4.5 times income, £210,000 supports around £945,000 of borrowing, roughly £155,000 short of the £1.1m required. Even a lender potentially applying 5 times to the same figure reaches £1,050,000 and still falls short, and the small number of routes potentially offering more may also apply the most conservative reading of the bonus itself.
The loan also sat above £1m at just under 79% LTV, where criteria can tighten; see our guide to large loans (£1m+) → A larger deposit would have lowered the LTV but would not have changed how the income was read, and the client did not want to run down his remaining savings to cover a shortfall created by the assessment method.
Director and Mortgage Adviser
Specialist mortgage broker for City professionals. David advises hedge fund analysts, portfolio managers and partners whose pay is weighted toward discretionary performance-linked bonus, and structures applications so a variable multi-year history supports the case for sustainability.
Lender Strategy
Most of the panel may read a down year the same way, taking the latest figure and discounting it. A smaller group assess sustainability across a longer record, and within that group the methods differ in ways that mattered here.
The case was placed with a clearing bank from the bonus-friendly tier of our panel, whose approach may recognise 60% of a sustainable bonus averaged over two years, with variable income capped at no more than base salary. On that method, the two-year average is £270,000 plus £120,000 divided by two, which is £195,000. Applying 60% recognises £117,000 of bonus, inside the cap given the £150,000 base. Recognised income becomes £150,000 plus £117,000, or £267,000, and the £1.1m loan sits at roughly 4.1 times that figure, a mainstream multiple with no enhanced tier required. On the first reading, recognised income was £210,000; on this one it was £267,000. The £57,000 difference came entirely from the assessment method.
Worked example, reading the same bonus history
Senior hedge fund analyst, £150,000 base, four bonus years of £190,000 / £230,000 / £270,000 / £120,000
The same four-year history, assessed two ways.
- Base salary
- £150,000
- Latest bonus (down year)
- £120,000
- Bonus, year before
- £270,000
- Bonus, two and three years back
- £230,000 / £190,000
- Two-year bonus average
- £195,000
- Buying at
- Just under 79% Loan to Value (LTV)
£150,000 salary plus 50% of the £120,000 latest bonus = £210,000 recognised. At 4.5× that supports around £945,000, roughly £155,000 short of the £1.1m required.
Two-year average (£270,000 + £120,000) / 2 = £195,000. 60% recognises £117,000, inside the cap at the £150,000 base. £150,000 + £117,000 = £267,000 recognised, and £1.1m sits at roughly 4.1× that figure.
The same payslips, assessed two ways. Recognised income runs from £210,000 to £267,000, and the £57,000 difference comes entirely from the assessment method.
Please note: These figures are for illustrative purposes only. The actual amount you can borrow will depend upon your personal circumstances, credit profile, LTV, the lender's individual criteria and a full affordability assessment.
The application had to show the bonus was sustainable, so the evidence went beyond the minimum: four years of payslips, P60s and bonus award letters rather than the standard two, plus a short covering note on the down year. The fund had a flat year, the bonus pool contracted, and the award tracked the fund result. The client's role and base salary were unchanged, and the two years before the peak showed £190,000 and £230,000: a consistent multi-year record with one soft year, not a spike followed by a fall. Every bonus had been paid in cash, so there was no deferred component to argue over.
For how this treatment varies across the market, see our complete guide to bonus income mortgages →
The Result
The Result
A £1,100,000 mortgage agreed at just under 79% LTV, with the deposit unchanged at £300,000
£1,100,000
Loan
Just under 79%
LTV
£267,000
Recognised income (salary + 60% of two-year bonus average)
Roughly 4.1×
Income multiple
First call
Day 0
Full mortgage offer
A little over 3 weeks
Completion
Around 8 weeks after offer
Seller's timetable
Met
A £1,100,000 mortgage was agreed at just under 79% LTV, capital and interest over 30 years on a five-year fixed rate, on terms in line with high-street pricing at this loan size and LTV. First conversation to offer took a little over three weeks, and completion followed around eight weeks later, inside the seller's timetable. The deposit stayed at £300,000 and the client's remaining savings were untouched.
Why This Matters for Similar Clients
Hedge fund professionals whose latest bonus is down often assume they should wait for a rebound year before applying. Usually the more useful question is which lender reads the history. The same four years of awards can produce recognised income of £210,000 or £267,000 depending on the methodology applied, before any multiple comes into it. For anyone paid on fund performance, lender selection is where most of the outcome is decided.
Our full guide for hedge fund professionals → covers this in more depth.
What We Can Do for You
- Map how each lender's averaging method may read your specific bonus history, before any application goes in
- Match bonus-led profiles to lenders whose treatment of a down year fits the record
- Package payslips, P60s and award letters so an underwriter can trace every figure first time, with the down year addressed up front
- Structure the borrowing so the affordability arithmetic holds at the deposit and LTV you want
FAQs
Often, yes. Many lenders may default to the latest year's figure, but some assess sustainability across a longer record, including methods that average two years rather than taking the lower number. Which lender reads the history can matter more than the down year itself.
Approaches vary: some may use the latest year, some a two-year average, and many the lower of the two. A smaller number work from recent payslips annualised. When a bonus swings year to year, the method chosen can move recognised income significantly.
Commonly 50% to 60% of a discretionary annual bonus, and some lenders may cap variable income relative to base salary. Higher percentages may be available where a bonus is contractually guaranteed or paid monthly, which is rare in hedge fund contracts.
Payslips showing the payments, P60s, and bonus award letters, usually covering at least two years. Where a history includes a down year, a longer record and a clear explanation of that year can support a sustainability case.
Not directly. A larger deposit lowers the LTV, but borrowing capacity is driven by recognised income, and that is set by the lender's bonus methodology. Fixing the income recognition usually moves the number further than adding deposit.
Related Case Studies
YOUR HOME MAY BE REPOSESSED IF YOU DON’T KEEP UP REPAYMENTS ON YOUR MORTGAGE
Kite Mortgages is a trading style of Kite Financial Ltd which is an appointed representative of The Openwork Partnership, a trading style of Openwork Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
APPROVED BY THE OPENWORK PARTNERSHIP ON 29/07/2026
This client scenario is an amalgamation of cases we have handled. Details have been combined and adjusted to protect client confidentiality, and it does not describe a single client or transaction.